Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | The Journal of Headache and Pain

Fig. 6

From: Attentional network deficits in patients with migraine: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence

Fig. 6

Classification and regression models. (A) Feature selection for developing gradient boosting (XGB) classification model to distinguish patients from healthy controls and regression model to predict clinical characteristics of patients; (B) Importance ranking for each feature in the XGB classification model; (C) Correlation between real headache frequency and predicted headache frequency estimated by the XGB regression model using leave-one-out cross-validation; (D) Average reduction in loss for each feature across all splits and trees in regression model for predicting headache frequency. *p < 0.05. PSS-14, Perceived Stress Scale-14; IES, inverse efficiency score; RT, reaction time; IIRTV, intra-individual reaction time variability; ERS, event-related synchronization; AV, arousal vigilance; amp, amplitude; PSD, power spectral density; lat, latency; EV, executive vigilance; EC, executive control

Back to article page