Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Distribution of coping strategies among patients based on migraine characteristics

From: Coping strategies to stressful events in adolescents with migraine

 

Frequency of headache

Intensity of pain

Prophylactic treatment

 

High Frequency

Low Frequency

 

Severe Pain

Mild Pain

 

Receiving Treatment

Not Receiving Treatment

 

COPING CRI-Y

norm

dysfunctional

norm

dysfunctional

 

norm

dysfunctional

norm

dysfunctional

 

norm

dysfunctional

norm

dysfunctional

 

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

p-values

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

p-values

N

%

N

%

N

%

N

%

p-values

Logical Analysis

13

41.9%

18

58.1%

35

70.0%

15

30.0%

0.012

30

65.2%

16

34.8%

18

51.4%

17

48.6%

0.211

28

59.6%

19

40.4%

20

58.8%

14

41.2%

0.946

Positive Reappraisal

13

63.0%

30

37.0%

38

76.0%

12

24.0%

0.002

30

65.2%

16

34.8%

21

60.0%

14

40.0%

0.630

29

61.7%

18

38.3%

22

64.7%

12

35.3%

0.782

Seeking guidance and support

19

61.3%

12

38.7%

29

58.0%

21

42.0%

0.770

29

63.0%

17

37.0%

19

54.3%

16

45.7%

0.427

28

59.6%

19

40.4%

20

58.8%

14

41.2%

0.946

Problem Solving

15

48.4%

16

51.6%

34

68.0%

16

32.0%

0.079

23

50.0%

23

50.0%

26

74.3%

9

25.7%

0.027

30

63.8%

17

36.2%

19

55.9%

15

44.1%

0.470

Total Approach

16

51.6%

15

48.4%

44

88.0%

6

12.0%

 < .001

34

75.6%

11

24.4%

26

72.2%

10

27.8%

0.734

37

78.7%

10

21.3%

23

67.6%

11

32.4%

0.262

Cognitive Avoidance

21

67.7%

10

32.3%

36

72.0%

14

28.0%

0.683

36

80.0%

9

20.0%

21

58.3%

15

41.7%

0.034

34

72.3%

13

27.7%

23

67.6%

11

32.4%

0.648

Acceptance or Resignation

17

54.8%

14

45.2%

33

66.0%

17

34.0%

0.315

24

53.3%

21

46.7%

26

72.2%

10

27.8%

0.082

30

63.8%

17

36.2%

20

58.8%

14

41.2%

0.647

Seeking alternative rewards

18

58.1%

13

41.9%

28

56.0%

22

44.0%

0.855

26

57.8%

19

42.2%

20

55.6%

16

44.4%

0.841

31

66.0%

16

34.0%

15

44.1%

19

55.9%

0.050

Emotional Discharge

21

67.7%

10

32.3%

38

76.0%

12

24.0%

0.417

33

73.3%

12

26.7%

26

72.2%

10

27.8%

0.911

33

70.2%

14

29.8%

26

76.5%

8

23.5%

0.946

Total Avoidance

25

80.6%

6

19.4%

46

92.0%

4

8.0%

0.131

38

84.4%

7

15.6%

33

91.7%

3

8.3%

0.326

42

89.4%

5

10.6%

29

85.3%

5

14.7%

0.583

  1. P-value adjusted after Bonferroni correction at 0.016