Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in migraine

From: Prioritising patient involvement in patient reported outcome measures– a PROMising way to improve headache care

PROM Name

Reference

Objective measures tested by the PROM

Response options

Recall period

Patient involvement:

HDI (Headache Disability Inventory)

Jacobson et al. 1994 [27]

25 items of functional and emotional impact

Mild, moderate, severe scoring system

Nil specified

No

HDQ (Headache-Specific Disability Questionnaire)

Niere et al. 2009 [28]

9 items of pain severity and functional impact

Scale of 0–10 (never/none to always/unable to do task)

The last month

No

HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test-6)

Kosinski et al. 2003 [29]

6 items about functional impact

Scale from never, rarely, sometimes, very often to always

The last 4 weeks

No

MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment)

Stewart et al. 1999 [30]

5 items about functional impact on chores, work and leisure

Number of days affected

The last 3 months

No

MSQv2.1

Martin et al. 2000 [31]

14 items about restrictions to work and leisure, prevention of work and leisure, and emotional impact

Number of days affected

The last 4 weeks

Yes

MSQOL (Migraine-Specific Quality of Life)

McKenna et al. 1998 [32]

14 items about functional impact on work, social life, energy levels, headache symptoms and general worries/concerns

6 point Likert scale from never, rarely, sometimes, pretty, almost, always

The last 4 weeks

Yes

HANA (Headache Needs Assessment)

Cramer et al. 2001 [33]

7 items about functional impact and mood

5 point Likert scale from never, rarely, sometimes, often to all the time

The last 4 weeks

Yes

Eurolight

Andree et al. 2010 [34]

103 items about headache disability, disease management and quality of life

7% open questions, 15% numerical responses (number needed), 78% categorical (tick or no tick)

Varies from “yesterday”, the last 30 days, last 3 months, “the last year” and “last day you had headache”

No

CORS (Completeness of response to migraine therapy)

Coon et al. 2012 [35]

32 items related to satisfaction of migraine therapy e.g. completeness of relief, speed of relief, return to functionality, fatigue, overall satisfaction etc.

5 point Likert scale of zero/none of the time to four/always

Response to single dose of medication and its effect within 2 h and 24 h respectively

Yes

Migraine-ACT (migraine assessment of current therapy)

Dowson et al. 2004 [36]

4 items for evaluation of acute medication e.g. speed, extent and consistency of relief

Yes/no responses to all 4 questions

Last 2 h since taking acute medication

No

MTAQ (Migraine Therapy Assessment questionnaire)

Chatterton et al. 2002 [37]

9 items to identify potential management issues e.g. migraine control, treatment satisfaction and economic burden of treatment

Yes/no responses to all questions

Last 2 h since taking acute medication

Yes

M-TOQ-5 (Migraine Treatment Optimisation-5 questionnaire)

Lipton et al. 2009 [31]

5 items about treatment optimisation

Yes/no responses

Varies from last 2 h of taking acute medication to last 24 h

No

M-TOQ-15 (Migraine Treatment Optimisation-15 questionnaire)

Lipton et al. 2009 [38]

15 items about treatment optimisation

Yes/no responses

Varies from last 2 h of taking acute medication to last 24 h, up to last 4 weeks

No

M-TOQ (Migraine Treatment Optimisation questionnaire)

Lipton et al. 2009 [38]

19 items about treatment optimisation

Yes/no responses

Varies from last 2 h of taking acute medication to last 24 h, up to last 4 weeks

No

PPMQ-R (Patient perception of migraine treatment- revised)

Revicki et al. 2006 [39]

29 items about satisfaction with migraine treatment e.g. efficacy, function, cost, side effects

7 point Likert scale from very satisfied to dissatisfied

Varies from last 24 h to last 4 weeks

Yes

SF-36 (Short Form Healthy Survey 36)– headache specific

Magnusson et al. 2012 [40]

36 items about quality of life and disability with general questions about health, physical health, body pain, and general pain

5 point Likert scale from poor-excellent, 5 point Likert scale from much better to much worse, 3 point scale from limited a lot to limited a little, to yes/no answers

Last 4 weeks

No

SF-12 (Short Form Healthy Survey 12)

Ware et al. 1996 [41]

Quality of life and disability

5 point Likert scale from poor-excellent, 5 point Likerty scale from much better to much worse, 3 point scale from limited a lot to limited a little, to yes/no answers

Last 24 h to last week

No

EQ-5D (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions)

EuroQOL Group 1990 [42]

15 items about quality of life

Tick for yes/no

Today

No

MIGraine attacks- Subjective COGnitive impairments scale (MIG-SCOG)

Gil Gouveia et al. 2011 [43]

9 items about subjective cognitive complaints regarding language and executive function

3 possible responses: often/sometimes/no

Not specified

Yes

The Migraine Work and Productivity Loss

Questionnaire (MWPLQ)

Lerner et al. 1999 [44]

29 items to assess impact of migraine and its therapies on paid work

6 point Lickert scale ranging from ‘no difficulty’ to ‘couldn’t do at all’

Most recent episode of migraine

Yes