Skip to main content

Distinct expression profile reveals glia involvement in the trigeminal system attributing to post-traumatic headache

A Correction to this article was published on 14 January 2025

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a common comorbid symptom affecting at least one-third of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). While neuroinflammation is known to contribute to the development of PTH, the cellular mechanisms in the trigeminal system crucial for understanding the pathogenesis of PTH remain unclear.

Methods

A non-invasive repetitive mTBI (4 times with a 24-h interval) was induced in male mice and effect of mTBI was tested on either bregma or pre-bregma position on the head. Periorbital allodynia and spontaneous pain behavior were assessed using von Frey test and grimace score, respectively. Quantitative PCR was used to assess extent of mTBI pathology. RNA sequencing was performed to obtain transcriptomic profile of the trigeminal ganglion (TG), trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C) and periaqueductal gray (PAG) at 7 days post-TBI. Subsequently, quantitative PCR, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry were used to examine mRNA and protein expression of glia specific markers and pain associated molecules.

Results

The repetitive impacts at the bregma, but not pre-bregma site led to periorbital hypersensitivity, which was correlated with enhanced inflammatory gene expression in multiple brain regions. RNA sequencing revealed mTBI induced distinct transcriptomic profiles in the peripheral TG and central Sp5C and PAG. Using gene set enrichment analysis, positive enrichment of non-neuronal cells in the TG and neuroinflammation in the Sp5C were identified to be essential in the pathogenesis of PTH. In situ assays also revealed that gliosis of satellite glial cells in the TG and astrocytes in the Sp5C were prominent days after injury. Furthermore, immunohistochemical study revealed a close interaction between activated microglia and reactive astrocytes correlating with increased calretinin interneurons in the Sp5C.

Conclusions

Transcriptomics analysis indicated that non-neuronal cells in peripheral TG and successive in situ assays revealed that glia in the central Sp5C are crucial in modulating headache-like symptoms. Thus, selective targeting of glia cells can be a therapeutic strategy for PTH attributed to repetitive mTBI.

Peer Review reports

Background

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) causes a myriad of pathologies and symptoms. Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is one of the underreported comorbid symptoms of mTBI [1, 2] and is observed in over 30% of clinical diagnoses [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Repetitive head injuries are associated with an increased incidence of chronic pain, including headaches [6] and clinical data shows that the incidence of PTH varies tremendously involving different mechanisms [12]. Over the last two decades, the heterogeneous nature of PTH symptoms has led to increased understanding of different headache classifications [1, 2]. In parallel to these classifications, there are multiple PTH phenotypes and pathology associated with the trigeminal system is thought to underlie one of the phenotypes observed in the clinical population. Several theories regarding the central sensitization that triggers headaches, including migraine, have been proposed [13,14,15]. However, due to profound trigeminal innervation [16], the exact cellular and molecular mechanisms through which trigeminal regions are primed after mTBI for central pain sensitization of headache remain unclear.

Sensory pseudo-unipolar neurons in the trigeminal ganglion (TG) have innervation throughout the head including the facial region, meninges, scalp, cranial bones and neurovasculature [16,17,18,19]. These sensory neurons have a tight relationship with satellite glial cells (SGC) [20, 21]. Thus, neurons in the TG are prone to primary insults during head injury via the afferent fibers innervating the head and the injury may affect their first-order projections to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C) as well as other regions of the brainstem. However, these brain regions are subject to injury due to rotational movement [22, 23] which can impact their projections to the other areas of the brain, including periaqueductal gray (PAG), thalamus, parabrachial nucleus, and anterior cingulate cortex. Thus, head injury-induced pathologies in the TG and Sp5C could cause central sensitization in chronic pain conditions [24,25,26,27,28].

Preclinical models of neurotrauma have been reported for the past several decades [29,30,31]. Due to the nature of the injury model and heterogenous symptoms associated with trauma [32,33,34], the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms of trigeminal pain following head injury remain poorly understood. Recent evidence shows that invasive procedures have a major effect on sensory neurons of the TG [35, 36], leading to the development of trigeminal pain [37]. Therefore, non-invasive procedures are necessary to study the trigeminal pain pathway associated with mTBI. Here we used repetitive head injury induced by the closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration (CHIMERA) [38] and showed that development of headache-like symptoms depends on the localization of injury/trauma to the head. Using deep sequencing, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, we aimed to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms, particularly the inflammatory response, underlying the pathogenesis of PTH attributed to repetitive mTBI.

Methods and materials

Induction of repetitive mTBI animal model

Two months old male C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory and were habituated for a week before experimental procedures. Once habituated, mice were randomized into different groups. Baseline measurements for von Frey and grimace were obtained prior to repeated mTBI. On the day of the mTBI procedure, mice were acclimated in the procedure room for 30 min. Each mouse was anesthetized under 3% isoflurane in an induction box, and was then placed in supine position under 1.5–2% isoflurane on the CHIMERA (Closed-Head Impact Model of Engineered Rotational Acceleration) stage as described [38]. After a stabilized breathing response and within 2–3 min of anesthesia each mouse received a hit from the piston with an energy level of 0.7 J. Since the position of mTBI determines the severity of comatose and brainstem pathologies following the injury [39], mice received TBI impacts in either one of the midline positions (pre-bregma or bregma regions, n = 6/group) shown in Fig. 1. The distance between the two hit positions differed by ~ 0.5 cm. Immediately following mTBI, each mouse was placed in the supine position on fresh bedding material and their righting reflexes (comatose or time of recovery from mTBI) were recorded. Mice in the sham group (n = 6) were placed on the CHIMERA stage with anesthesia and without mTBI for the same 2–3 min duration. After gaining consciousness, mice were returned to their respective home cages. Based on preliminary experiments, we have found that mice with repeated mild injury tend to develop allodynia. Hence, the above procedure was repeated once a day for 4 days. All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the NIH and AVMA guidelines and approved by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Behavioral assessments following mTBI in mice. a A schematic representation of the experimental procedure, with an illustration depicting the position of mTBI hits on the dorsum of the head and a timeline depicting behavioral measurement and sample collection. b Increased righting reflex, a measure of comatose state, in mice following mTBI in the bregma or pre-bregma positions. c Depending on localization of injury, mTBI induced differential peri-orbital sensitivity or mechanical threshold measured by von Frey filaments in the periorbital region. d Increased grimace score in mTBI mice observed 5 days after the last mTBI hit on bregma position. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001 and ****, p < 0.0001. (n = 5–6/group, Mean ± SEM)

Behavioral assessment

On the 6th day after the last TBI impact, mechanical allodynia was measured in the periorbital region using von Frey method. Mechanical threshold measurements were obtained using a simplified Chaplan up-down method [40, 41]. Prior to von Frey test, each mouse was tail restrained in a red tube and habituated for 10 min once a day for two days. On the test day, a series of calibrated von Frey filaments (Bioseb, France) ranging from 0.02 g to 2 g were applied to the midline periorbital region between the eyes. Each filament was perpendicularly placed on the midline region and pressed firmly with sufficient force to bend the filament. A positive response was defined as a rapid withdrawal of the head, or shaking of the head, or retrieving back or face wipe. A minimum of 20–30 s elapsed between filament tests.

To measure spontaneous pain response following mTBI, a separate cohort of mice was tested for grimace using mouse grimace score [42]. Prior to mTBI, mice were habituated in plastic animal enclosures (approximately 10 × 20 × 15 cm) for 15 min and on test days each mouse was tested for 10 min. Baseline and post-injury grimace scores were obtained from several still pictures and if needed, grimace was confirmed from video recordings. Of the 5 standard mouse grimace features, grimace such as periorbital tightening and altered ear positions were prominent in this mouse cohort and were used in the grimace analyses. In a separate cohort to determine long term effect of mTBI, grimace was measured on day 6, day 16 and day 22 post mTBI. All tests were performed between 10 AM and 3 PM. The experimenters were blind to the treatment conditions.

Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR)

To determine regional differences in gene expression following mTBI in pre-bregma or bregma positions (n = 5–6/group), fresh frozen samples from several brain regions were collected by cryosectioning at 250 µm using dissection mentioned above or using Palkovits punch method. We collected different pain-related brain regions, including Sp5C, PAG (described above), parabrachial nucleus/locus coeruleus (PB/LC), and thalamus. Because the parabrachial nucleus (PB) and locus coeruleus (LC) are in close proximity, both PB and LC were collected together during the Palkovits punch method. Further, to identify temporal variations in the gene expression profile, in a separate cohort (n = 6–7/group), fresh TG samples were obtained day1 and day 8 after the last mTBI. Total RNA was extracted using Zymo Research spin column as per manufacturer's instructions. Because TG samples are highly myelinated, excess TRI Reagent was used to yield a good amount of RNA. RNA (1-2 μg) was reverse transcribed using Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, and qPCR was performed using primer sets for genes listed in Table 1.

Table 1 List of primes used in quantitative PCR

Bulk RNAseq and gene set enrichment analysis

Seven days following the repetitive mTBI, flash frozen TG (n = 3/group), cryo-dissected Sp5C (n = 3/group; bregma from -8.15 mm to -7.64 mm and medio-lateral 1.25 mm) and PAG (n = 3/group; bregma from -3.4 mm to -4.96 mm and medio-lateral 0.65 mm) were processed for sequencing. RNA-seq was performed at GENEWIZ (Chelmsford, MA). RNA was extracted using Rneasy Plus Universal mini kit and RNA from TG, Sp5C and PAG samples had a RIN > 8.4 (TapeStation) and concentrations were determined by Qubit RNA Assay. The following configuration was used for sequencing: Illumina HiSeq 2 × 150 bp paired end sequencing on an average of 35 M reads per sample. Deseq2 analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed genes using apeglm algorithm in lfcShrink function [43].

Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) and KEGG pathway analyses were performed using ‘clusterprofiler’ and curated mouse gene sets from ‘msigdbr’ libraries obtained from Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) were used to identify enriched gene sets in the mTBI group. Gene ontology of biology processing from C5 collections were used for GSEA. Dotplots for the GSEA were obtained using tidyverse’s ‘ggplot’ or ‘pathview’ and ‘enrichplot’ bioconductor packages.

Due to recent advances in single cell transcriptomics, there is an increased understanding of the TG cell specific gene expression in headache pathology and TG specific cell atlas [35, 36]. Custom gene sets were built containing gene sets specific for TG cell populations [36]. These custom-built reference gene sets were then used for enrichment analyses to identify specific TG cell types involved in mTBI. We then also performed a meta-analysis to identify commonly expressed genes between the current mTBI dataset and different headache or injury models (induced by cortical spreading depression, inflammatory soup, spared nerve injury, facial lesion and scratch). Because these transcriptomic datasets are from single nuclear RNAseq, pseudobulk differential expression analysis was performed (as described in Harvard Chan Bioinformatics Core for scRNA-seq pseudobulk DE analysis) and Deseq2 tool was used as described above. For meta-analysis we used p-value combined approach using Fishers methods available in metaRNAseq or MetaVolcanoR packages.

In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry

Based on gene set enrichment analysis and differential expression data, selective genes were used for in situ hybridization using RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent v2 assays (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Inc, Newark, CA). The hybridization assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fresh frozen protocol was used for TG (12 μm thick sections) and the fixed-frozen protocol was used for the Sp5C (15 μm thick sections) with protease treatment for 15 min and 30 min, respectively. Localization of markers of satellite glial cells such as Slc1a2 (Cat No. 441341), Gfap (Cat No. 313211) and Kcnj10 (Cat No. 458831) were used to identify the specificity of cell types in the TG. To identify the expression levels of mRNA (Gfap—Cat No. 313211) as well as protein in the Sp5C, immunohistochemistry was performed following in situ hybridization using manufacturer’s instructions. Localization of the GFAP was identified using Anti-GFAP (1:500 dilution; Dako Polyclonal Rabbit Z033429-2), followed by rinsing and incubation with a secondary antibody (Alexa-Fluor 488).

To determine inflammatory response by assessing microglial activation in the Sp5C, we used CD68 (1:300 dilution; eBioscience FA-11; rat anti-CD68) and Iba1 (1:500 dilution; Novus NB100-1028; goat anti-Iba1) in a separate assay. For assessing inflammation induced pain signaling (see below), we also performed calretinin immunostaining (1:500 dilution; Swant 6B3; goat anti-calretinin) in the Sp5C and co-immunostained with neurofilament L (1:5000, Encor; RPCA-NF-L-Degen) to define the boundaries of the superficial lamina.

Imaging of the tissue sections used for quantitative analysis was performed using Zeiss Axioscan Z1 Slide Scanner. Confocal images were obtained using the Zeiss 980 Confocal microscope. To identify the fine cell process, z-stack images at 1–2 µm intervals were acquired and maximal projection was applied to all images. Calretinin intensity measurement was performed using Profile View in Zen Lite 3.9.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were performed using R 4.2.3 (https://www.R-project.org/). Packages in tidyverse library [44] were used for data processing and analyses. Behavioral and quantitative gene expression data among sham, bregma and pre-bregma mTBI groups were analyzed using mixed effect models or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Further, due to variability in between sections, fluorescence intensity within tissue sections was normalized. Quantitative cell counts or intensity of immunostains between sham and mTBI group were analyzed using stats package lm regression model or welsh test using lme4 package. Effects of mTBI were considered significant at an alpha level of 0.05. All datasets were tested for normality assumptions and when assumptions were violated, non-parametric test (Wilcoxon test) was used. All data were represented as mean ± standard error.

Results

Periorbital allodynia and spontaneous pain behavior in mice with repetitive mTBI

Acceleration head injury model by CHIMERA resulted in an increased righting reflex on each of the 4 mTBI days, which reflected an increased unconscious state. On average, irrespective of the hit position, the righting reflex of mTBI mice was ~ 53 s more than the sham group (F(2, 93) = 7.7, p = 0.00079; Fig. 1b). On each of the four repetitive mTBI days, no significant difference was observed between bregma and pre-bregma hit groups (Additional File 1).

In contrast to the increased righting reflex, 6 days after the last mTBI, only mice that received repeated mTBI hits in the bregma position showed significantly reduced mechanical threshold in the periorbital region, compared to the sham group (F(2, 23) = 9.41, p = 0.001; Fig. 1c). Mice that received repeated mTBI in the pre-bregma position had an estimated coefficient of -0.08 g (p = 0.59), whereas the mTBI group in the bregma position had an estimated coefficient of -0.81 g compared to the sham group (p < 0.01). Since pre-bregma position hit did not induce periorbital sensitivity, grimace, gene expression and histology were performed in mTBI mice that exhibited periorbital sensitivity from hit in the bregma position. In a separate cohort, where mice received repetitive hits in the bregma position, grimace was measured at 5 days post-injury. Spontaneous pain measured using grimace was significantly increased in the mTBI group compared to shams (F(1, 15) = 7.118, p = 0.01755; Fig. 1d). Further, a significant increase in grimace was noticed on week 2 and week 3 following mTBI (Additional File 2).

Gene expression in the trigeminal pain regions following mTBI

Next, we used quantitative PCR to determine mRNA expression in several pain associated regions following mTBI in the pre-bregma or bregma positions. Recent evidence shows that Egr1, early growth response 1—an immediate early gene, is associated with injury to ganglionic cells [35, 45]. To identify whether mTBI induced injury in the TG the expression of Egr1 was examined. Similar to mTBI mice (bregma hit) exhibiting mechanical allodynia, only the mTBI bregma group showed increased Egr1 mRNA expression in the TG (p = 0.018, Fig. 2a) compared to the sham group. Since gliosis and neuroinflammation are the primary sequelae to injury, we also examined generic astrocytes (Gfap) and activated microglia/macrophage (Aif1, Cd68, Trem2) markers in different brain regions including the Sp5C, PAG, PB/LC and thalamus. As anticipated, different regions had differential expression of these genes (Fig. 2b) and the expression levels of these markers were considerably higher in the bregma hit group (p = 1.48e-07) than the pre-bregma hit group (p = 0.00579), which were both greater than the expression in the sham group. In particular, the markers for microglia/macrophages were upregulated in the Sp5C compared to PAG, PB/LC and thalamus, while the astrocyte marker gene expression was highly upregulated in the PAG compared to Sp5C, PB/LC and thalamus.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Quantitative gene expression in the TG and brain regions following mTBI on pre-bregma or bregma positions. a Fold change (qPCR) in Egr1 (early growth response 1) mRNA expression in the TG 7 days post-TBI. Data (n = 6) in the bar graph are represented as mean ± standard error. *, p < 0.05. b Heatmap representing qPCR fold changes (FC) in the gene expression of Gfap, Aif1, Cd68 and Trem2 in the Sp5C, PAG, PB/LC and the thalamus. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01 (n = 5–6/group)

Regional transcriptomics and gene set enrichment analysis following mTBI

Following the initial gene expression analyses, three pain related regions (TG, Sp5C and PAG) from bregma hit position were sequenced for subsequent analyses. As expected, transcriptomics data obtained from the TG, Sp5C and PAG revealed distinct gene expression profiles (Fig. 3a). More than 70% of the variance was observed between peripheral (TG) and central (Sp5C/PAG) regions. Whereas, within the brain, 21% variance was observed between the Sp5C and PAG. Similarly, the number of differentially expressed genes varied between regions (with log fold change >  ± 1, p-adjusted < 0.05 and base mean count > 10). Specifically, differential expression of 4862 genes between TG and Sp5C, 5268 genes between TG and PAG and, within the brain, 2056 genes between Sp5C and PAG were noted.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Transcriptome analyses from TG, Sp5C and PAG following mTBI. a Principal component analysis of mouse transcriptome from TG, Sp5C, and PAG shows three distinct gene clusters belonging to the peripheral ganglion (TG), the medulla (Sp5C) and midbrain (PAG) regions. b Dot plots of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) in the TG following repetitive mTBI, representing the 15 most differentially enriched biological process gene sets obtained from the C5 collection in the mouse molecular signatures database. Dot plots of GSEA analysis in the Sp5C (c) and PAG (d) of mTBI mice, representing the most differentially enriched biological process gene sets obtained from the C5 collection in the mouse molecular signatures database. Data used for PCA and GSEA were obtained from n = 3/group/region

Gene set enrichment analyses showed a distinct profile between TG and Sp5C or PAG following mTBI. Although gene sets involved in cell differentiation, tissue repair and remodeling were commonly expressed following mTBI, gene sets related to immune functions were suppressed in the TG but not in the Sp5C or PAG (Fig. 3b-d, Additional File 3). Particularly, following mTBI, gene sets from biological processes of gene ontology showed decreased enrichment (negative sign of normalized enrichment score) of the following GO terms: B cells, T cells, leukocytes, cellular defense response, response to virus, defense response to bacteria, and response to interferon gamma in the TG. Nonetheless, postsynaptic regulation, regulation of ion transport, neuropeptide signaling pathway, and neural precursor of cell proliferation were enriched in the TG of mTBI mice.

In contrast to the TG, with an exception of a few, the majority of the gene sets in the Sp5C of medulla and the PAG of the midbrain, were enriched 7 days following mTBI. The only gene sets with negative enrichment score in the Sp5C following TBI were related to microtubule organization which includes axoneme assembly, cilium movement, flagellum dependent cell motility, and microtubule bundle formation. In the PAG, only the gene set related to ensheathment of neurons was negatively enriched. Full list of enriched gene sets obtained from GSEA analyses from all the regions were presented in Additional File 3.

mTBI induced TG specific gene set enrichment analysis and meta-analysis

A GSEA analysis using custom gene sets specific for TG cell types [35, 36] showed that non-neuronal cells were highly enriched compared to neuronal cells following mTBI (Fig. 4a). Particularly, positive enrichment scores were identified for fibroblast, myelinated schwann cells (p < 0.05) and satellite glial cells (p = 0.18). In contrast, immune cells and neurons (somatostatin, neurofilament cluster—NF 1–3, non-peptidergic, cLTMRs) specific gene sets showed negative enrichment (p < 0.05). Enrichment of fibroblast and satellite glial cells was consistent with other headache models, such as migraine induced by cortical spreading depression (CSD) or inflammatory soup (IS) [36].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison of the TG transcriptome of mTBI mice with TG cell atlas. a Dot plot representing enriched gene clusters of different cell types in the TG. Non-neuronal gene clusters have positively normalized enrichment scores (p-adjusted values < 0.2) and neuronal gene clusters have negative normalized enrichment scores (p-adjusted < 0.05). Abbreviations: cLTMRs—C-fiber low threshold mechanoreceptor (LTMR); fibroblast_Dcn—DCN + meningeal fibroblasts; fibroblast_Mgp—MGP + meningeal fibroblast; NF1, neurofilament + A-LTMR enriched for A-beta-field; NF2, neurofilament + A-LTMR enriched for A-beta-RA and A-beta-field; NF3, neurofilament + LTMR enriched for A-delta; NP—non-peptidergic nociceptor; Schwann_M, myelinating Schwann cells; SST, somatostatin positive pruriceptors [abbreviations see reference [36]]

Secondly, the overlapping genes between mTBI and other headache or TG injury models were identified using meta-analysis. Because TG samples were collected 7 days following mTBI, only minimal fold changes were noted in the current transcriptomic dataset. Thus, to identify overlapping genes between mTBI and different TG pathology models, a less constraint fold change was used in the current dataset. Since the sequencing datasets from spared nerve injury (SNI), facial lesion and scratch injury [35] were based on TG neuronal population, the number of overlapping genes were reasonably lower compared to those obtained from all cell population in the CSD and IS models [36]. Nonetheless, a majority of the overlapping genes were upregulated (Table 2). A few genes such as Lmo7 (LIM domain 7), involved in protein–protein interaction, overlapped among all models including mTBI, and Nts (neurotensin) overlapped between mTBI, CSD, spared nerve injury, facial injury and scratch. Kccn3 (Potassium Calcium-Activated Channel Subfamily N Member 3) overlapped between mTBI, CSD and IS and belongs to TRPM8 (Transient receptor potential melastatin subtype 8) neuronal cluster. Neuronal injury marker, Atf3—ATF/CREB family of transcription factors, was overlapped between mTBI, SNI, facial lesion and scratch injury, reflecting Egr1 expression in mTBI. Non-neuronal cell markers particularly for schwann cells, satellite glia, fibroblast and vascular endothelial cells were commonly expressed between mTBI, CSD and IS. Interestingly, satellite glial markers such as Gfap, Iqgap2 (cytoskeleton interacting protein), Slc6a6 (sodium and chloride-ion dependent transporter) were shared in mTBI, CSD and IS models. Only a few shared genes (Hmx1, Itga11 and Fhit) were down regulated in mTBI, CSD and IS and were related to distinct neuronal clusters (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of overlapping genes between mTBI and other TG pathology models

Although spinal dorsal horn and Sp5C share some similarities in the rexed laminae appearance, due to unique somatotopy and circuitry, Sp5C have quite distinct neurophysiological properties [46]. Since, Sp5C specific transcriptome is not available yet, we utilized the brainstem astrocyte specific gene sets [47] and found that astrocyte specific gene ontology gene sets were enriched in the mTBI (Additional File 4).

Validation of gene expression in the TG

Transcriptomics data identified that gene sets associated with ion channel transport and satellite glial cells were positively enriched in mTBI mice. Moreover, satellite glia cells have gained attention in the past several years due to their involvement in pain mechanisms [20, 21]. Therefore, we focused on specific glia markers, Gfap (glial fibrillary acidic protein), Kcnj10 (potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 10), Gja1 (gap junction protein, connexin 43), and Slc1a2 (solute carrier family 1—glial high affinity glutamate transporter). In a separate cohort (n = 7–8/group), quantitative gene expression of satellite glia markers revealed that Gfap and Slc1a2 (Fig. 5a) were upregulated one day after the last mTBI and continued to show increased expression 1-week post mTBI (p < 0.01). Gja1 was slightly increased on day 1 (p = 0.0525), but was significantly upregulated at 1-week post-injury (p = 0.0339, Fig. 5a). Using multiplex in situ hybridization, mTBI mice showed increased expression of these markers in satellite glia surrounding neurons of the TG (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Mild TBI induced gene expression of satellite glial markers in the TG. a Fold change (qPCR) in gene expression of satellite glial markers (Gfap, Gja1 and Slc1a2) in the TG of mTBI mice. Bar graphs show mRNA expression on day 1 and day 8 after the last mTBI. Data (n = 5–6/group) in the bar graph are represented as mean ± standard error. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01. b Localization of mRNA expression of Kcnj10 (green), Gfap (red) and Slc1a2 (magenta) in the TG of sham and mTBI mice obtained at 7 days post injury. Scale bar = 50 µm

Neuroinflammation in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis

Trigeminal nucleus caudalis showed a wide range of gene expression changes in the transcriptomic data. Importantly, GO terms such as inflammatory response, immune response, cytokine production and regulation of immune system processes were highly enriched in the Sp5C. Diffuse nature of mTBI injury and innervation of primary trigeminal afferents, to the Sp5C, between trigeminal subnuclei and other brainstem regions [48,49,50], have prompted our investigation of activated microglia using immunohistochemistry in different regions of rostral-caudal extent of the trigeminal Sp5C (Fig. 6). Based on the area and cell number, a significant proliferation of CD68 + Iba1 + cells in the white matter, particularly in the spinocerebellar tract (sc, p = 3.01e-11; Fig. 6a-c) was noted, while a moderate increase in the tectospinal tract (ts, p = 0.0038) and pyramidal tract (py, p = 0.0013) was observed. In the gray matter, the gracile nucleus (Gr) was found to have significantly increased expression of CD68 + Iba1 + cells (Gr, p < 0.001). Inter reticular nucleus showed a moderate increase in microglia (IRt, p = 0.0407) and no differences were noted in the reticular nucleus (MdV, p = 0.623). Although no significant difference was found in the rostral Sp5C (p = 0.192) and caudal Sp5C (p = 0.4), CD68 intensity within the Iba1 + cells in Sp5C was significantly higher in the mTBI group (Fig. 6d and e, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, these Iba1 + cells were in close association with GFAP + cells/fibers (Fig. 7f and also see below). Furthermore, morphological differences in microglia were noted in the white matter tracts, gracile nucleus and Sp5C (Additional File 5).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Differential expression of inflammatory markers using immunohistochemistry in the trigeminocervical complex of mTBI mice. a Representative images from sham and mTBI mice showing immunostaining for CD68 in Iba1 + cells in the caudal Sp5C (Bregma coordinate ~ -8.6) and (b) the rostral Sp5C (Bregma coordinate ~ -8.1). c Increased CD68/Iba1 + cell count, most notable in the fiber tracts and in the gracile nucleus of mTBI mice. d and e Increased CD68 intensity within Iba1 + cells in the Sp5C of mTBI mice compared to the sham group. n = 10–15 cells/section; n = 3 mice /group. Abbreviations: Cu—cuneate nucleus; Gr—gracile nucleus; IRt—Intermediate reticular nucleus; Mdv—Medullary reticular nucleus, ventral part; py—pyramidal tract; sc—spinocerebellar tract; Sp5c (MDH)—spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn); ts—tectospinal tract. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001 and ****, p < 0.0001. (n = 5–6/group, Mean ± SEM)

Fig. 7
figure 7

Reactive astrogliosis in brainstem of mTBI mice 7 days following injury. a An example brainstem section at the Bregma level -8.2 stained with GFAP (green, immunohistochemistry) and Gfap (red, in situ hybridization). Scale bar = 200 µm. b Insets in Fig. 7a representing differences in Gfap mRNA/GFAP antibody (Ab) staining in various brainstem regions. Representative confocal images from a sham (c) and a mTBI (d) mouse showing colocalization of Gfap mRNA (red, in situ hybridization) on GFAP + astrocytes (green, immunohistochemistry) in the Sp5c. Scale bar = 50 µm. Inset of 7d from a mTBI mouse Sp5C shows increased Gfap mRNA expression in the processes of GFAP + astrocytes in lamina III of Sp5C. Scale bar = 20 µm. e) Graph representing percent Gfap mRNA expression in GFAP + fibrous astrocytes in the Sp5c of sham (n = 155 fibers) and mTBI (n = 168 fibers) groups. f) Close proximity of GFAP-ir fibers or cells to Iba1/CD68 + cells in different regions of the brainstem are shown in white arrows. GFAP-ir fibers or cells that are not in close contact with Iba1/CD68 + cells are shown in purple arrows. g) Representative images showing localized expression of Slc1a2 in the Sp5C of sham and mTBI mice. Scale bar = 500 µm. h) Presence of GFAP + astrocytes (green, immunohistochemistry) in close proximity to Slc1a2 mRNA puncta (purple, in situ hybridization) in the lamina III of Sp5C are shown in white arrows. Scale bar = 50 µm. IRt—Intermediate reticular nucleus; Mdv—Medullary reticular nucleus, ventral part; py—pyramidal tract; sc—spinocerebellar tract; Sp5c (MDH)- spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn); ts—tectospinal tract

Because astrocytes specific gene sets were also enriched in the Sp5C transcriptomic data (Additional File 4) and known to be involved in inflammation [51, 52], in parallel to the TG, we also investigated glia expression in the Sp5C of mTBI mice. Similar to gene expression changes in the TG, Gfap mRNA level in the Sp5C was upregulated 1-week post-injury (Fig. 2b and Fig. 7c-e). In contrast to the TG, Gfap mRNA expression was found colocalized on long astrocytic processes identified by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 7a-c). Particularly, a fold increase in Gfap mRNA expression was observed at the long processes of GFAP + astrocytes in mTBI mice (Fig. 7e). Although Gfap mRNA was present in the superficial layer of Sp5C and increased in mTBI (Fig. 7c and d), due to high density of astrocyte soma in the superficial layer we were unable to quantify Gfap mRNA in GFAP + soma. Immunostaining also showed that astrocytes in the Sp5C have a distinct expression pattern as they transverse through deep layers of the Sp5C. Compared to the reticular formation (Fig. 7b), only sparse presence of protoplasmic astrocytes were noted in the Sp5C (Fig. 7a-b and Additional File 6). Moreover, in some sections, Gfap + astrocytes processes were bundled in the sham group while these astrocytes processes were separated in the mTBI group. Although GFAP + processes traversed from lamina 1 and deeper into lamina 3 (Fig. 7d insert), no significant differences were found in the length of GFAP + processes in the Sp5C between sham and mTBI groups.

Due to the increased interest in the astrocyte-microglia interaction in neuroinflammation [53], we also performed triple immunohistochemistry targeting GFAP, Iba1 and CD68 + cells in the brainstem sections. Irrespective of the morphology of GFAP (i.e. either fibrous or protoplasmic astrocytes), a substantial proportion of the GFAP + fibers or cells were in close contact with Iba1/CD68 + cells (Fig. 7f). Interestingly, lamina 1 of the Sp5C had more GFAP + fibers in contact with Iba1/CD68 + cells (Fig. 7f—inset 1) than lamina 2 or 3 (Fig. 7f—inset 2–3). Other regions in the brainstem, such as reticular formation and white matter tracts also expressed GFAP + cells and fibers, respectively, in close proximity to the Iba1/CD68 + cells (Fig. 7f—inset 4–6).

Cellular mechanisms of pain modulation in the trigeminal Sp5C

Since we found increased reactive astrogliosis in the Sp5C of mTBI mice and glutamatergic signaling is well known to be involved in the pain modulation, we next investigated the changes of the glutamate transporter (Slc1a2 gene product of GLT1/EAAT2) in the trigeminal region, Sp5C. Interestingly, the Slc1a2 expression was well defined in the gray matter, particularly in the Sp5C. In contrast to our expectation, the expression of Slc1a2 was ubiquitous without clear boundaries and no identifiable difference was observed between sham and mTBI mice (Fig. 7g). In order to test whether GFAP + fibers in the Sp5C were in close proximity to Slc1a2 expression, we performed in situ hybridization of Gfap and Slc1a2 combined with GFAP immunohistochemistry, and found that the majority of GFAP + fibers containing Gfap mRNA were in close proximity to Slc1a2 mRNA expression in lamina 2 and 3 of Sp5C in mTBI mice (Fig. 7h).

Further to identify the causal relationship between cellular/molecular changes observed above and headache-like symptoms, we sought to characterize calretinin, a marker involved in allodynia associated with inflammatory pain [54]. We found a reorganization of calretinin immunoreactivity in the Sp5C (Fig. 8a, b) where the peak intensity of the calretinin immunoreactivity shifted from outer lamina II to lamina I in the Sp5C of mTBI mice (p = 0.0136). Moreover, we also identified that the number of calretinin cells differed between rostral-caudal extent of Sp5C and was higher in the mTBI mice (Fig. 8c). Although, the number of calretinin cells were lower in the rostral compared to caudal Sp5C, a significant increase was noted in the rostral Sp5C (p = 0.004) and a non-significant increase was noted in the caudal Sp5C (p = 0.1935).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Calretinin in the Sp5C of mTBI mice potentially involved in trigeminal pain. a Reorganization of calretinin-ir was observed from outer lamina II to lamina I of mTBI mice (n = 3; Bregma coordinate ~ 8.2). Full extent of this reorganization is shown in Additional File 7. b Representative images from sham and mTBI mice at Sp5C show the shift in calretinin-ir from lamina II to lamina I. Scale bar = 50 µm. c Increased number of calretinin-ir neurons in the rostral Sp5c compared to the caudal Sp5c of mTBI mice. **, p < 0.01

Discussion

We found that non-invasive mTBI using the acceleration method induced comatose state as well as headache-like symptoms, which resemble the hallmark comorbid conditions of TBI observed in clinical populations [8, 55,56,57,58]. Distinct expression profiles and increased inflammation in the pain associated regions following mTBI showed that there was a concerted effort of different brain regions involved in multimodal components of pain [59, 60], thereby experiencing both mechanical allodynia as well as spontaneous nociceptive pain response.

Repetitive mTBI induced allodynia and grimace

In the clinical population, mild head injury has higher prevalence for developing PTH [6, 11, 61]. Similar to clinical cases of mTBI in both nonhuman primates and humans [8, 56, 58], where patients typically lose consciousness for less than 30 min, our mouse model exhibited unconsciousness for a few minutes post-injury. It has been reported that the number of injuries correlates with an increase in persistent headache symptoms [6] and brain pathology [62]. This set the precedent for repetitive head injury in our model where mice developed periorbital sensitivity and grimace over time. In line with this observation in mice, decreased mechanical threshold is one of the characteristics of patients experiencing post-traumatic headache [63, 64]. Particularly, here we have shown that there are differences in the site of injury on head where mTBI mice exhibit distinct mechanical pain thresholds and varying degrees of inflammatory gene expression in the brain. Although mice were in comatose state after receiving mTBI either in the bregma or pre-bregma position on the dorsum of the head, only mice that received mTBI in the bregma position displayed periorbital sensitivity and grimace thereby mimicking symptoms similar to post-traumatic headache. This could potentially be related to injury to the trigeminal nerve terminals surrounding the head [18, 65,66,67] and these results might explain the heterogeneity involved in mTBI induced symptoms. Effects of mTBI on grimace several days after injury pointed to the fact that mTBI induced by the acceleration method had clinical manifestation where headache symptoms were observed after injury [68]. The profound innervation of the head by the TG, as well as its first and second order connections to the Sp5C, PB, and PAG, suggests a potential role for these regions in the chronification of PTH [59, 69, 70].

Repetitive mTBI induced differences in gene expression

Having the proof of concept that periorbital sensitivity and grimace become prominent after repetitive mTBI, we investigated gene expression changes in the TG and several other pain related regions. Specifically, sensory information from the trigeminal system is relayed to the ascending pain regions, including PB/LC [67, 71, 72], PAG [73,74,75], and the thalamus [76]. Similar to existing literature on the difference in the location of impact and regional differences in brain pathology [77, 78], we found that non-invasive traumatic injury to the head, only at the bregma position, exhibited prominent changes in Egr1 gene expression in the TG and elevated gene expression of astrocytic and inflammatory markers in the Sp5C, PB/LC, PAG and the thalamus. This enhanced pathology of mTBI on the bregma position could be likely due to the proximity of injury to both coronal and sagittal sutures of the cranial vault, neurovasculature, and the biomechanics involved in the trauma [67, 79, 80]. Together, in our mTBI mouse model, injury to the bregma position on the head has increased TG/brain pathology that likely led to increased headache-like symptoms characterized by periorbital sensitivity and grimace.

To comprehensively assess gene expression following mTBI, we performed deep sequencing of the TG, Sp5C, and PAG in mTBI (bregma position) and sham groups. Due to the mild injury model used in this study and sequencing performed in samples collected 7 days post mTBI, fewer than 10 genes resulted in log2 fold change of greater than 1 in the tissues examined. Nonetheless, gene sets enrichment analyses provided an opportunity to understand co-regulated genes from these samples. At 7 days following repetitive mTBI, we found the peripheral TG had a distinct gene expression profile compared to the central Sp5C and PAG. The immunosuppressive state of the TG following mTBI might render it vulnerable to subsequent infection or injury and possibly leading to hyperexcitability of sensory neurons under certain pathogenic conditions [36, 81,82,83] or even by migraine-like triggers provided several days post injury [84,85,86,87]. In contrast to TG, the majority of gene expression in the Sp5C and PAG were upregulated following mTBI. The only difference between the Sp5C and PAG was gene sets involved in the microtubule formation and cilium movement, where these genes were downregulated in the Sp5C and upregulated in the PAG. This difference could be due to the proximity of brainstem Sp5C compared to the PAG, where severe axonal stretching may have led to microtubule disassembly [88, 89].

To further understand the cellular mechanisms of mTBI induced injury in the TG, we took advantage of recently published TG cell atlas [36]. Using the gene enrichment analyses, it was identified that non-neuronal gene clusters were highly enriched compared to neuronal gene clusters. Enrichment of fibroblast and satellite glial cells was consistent with other mouse headache models (inflammatory soup - IS or cortical spreading depression - CSD), but the enrichment of vascular cells shown in the inflammatory soup model [36] was not observed in our mTBI model. We also found that gene sets related to myelinated schwann cells were highly enriched in the mTBI and this could be of importance as schwann cell proliferation has been shown in other nerve injury models [90, 91] and might be involved in trigeminal pathology. Further, meta-analysis also revealed a distinct set of genes from this study significantly overlapped with severe injury models such as infra-orbital transection (spared nerve injury), facial lesion or scratch, inflammatory soup or cortical spreading depression models of headache. Injury markers [36] such as Atf3, and Sema6a overlapped between mTBI and severe injury models (spared nerve injury, facial lesion and scratch) reflecting that mTBI induced injury to the TG. Interestingly, Nts, neurotensin, was overlapped in the majority of the injury or headache model, and it has been well documented that neurotensin modulate neuropathic pain [92]. A number of genes related to schwann cells, fibroblast, satellite glia and vascular endothelial cells significantly overlapped between mTBI and headache models (CSD and IS), indicating that non-neuronal cells of the TG have a major role in headache pathology. A few ion channel markers, such as Kccn3 (potassium Calcium-Activated Channel Subfamily N Member 3) and Slc6a6 (sodium and chloride-ion dependent transporter) overlapped between mTBI, CSD and IS, where Kcnn3 has been associated with migraine pathology [93]. Nonetheless, less than 50 genes overlapped between mTBI and other models. As such, mTBI induced a distinct gene expression profile compared to other TG pathology models. Collectively, increased susceptibility of TG and distinct gene expression profile in the TG following mTBI could explain the headache heterogeneity following mTBI in clinical populations [2] and the challenge in translatability using animal models [32]. Nevertheless, non-neuronal gene clusters, particularly, satellite glia have gained particular interest for their potential role in headache pathology [20, 36].

Glial activation in the trigeminal regions following mTBI

In light of recent evidence, satellite glial cells show a remarkable functional heterogeneity in sensory ganglion [20, 21, 94, 95]. Here we focused on the expression of specific satellite glial cell markers following mTBI. Consistent with the literature, increased gene expression of Gfap, Gja1 and Connexin 43 (Cx43) suggested that mTBI induced increase in satellite glial activity could function as a protective mechanism [96], or to facilitate pain [20, 94] as the expression of these genes continued to increase through the post-injury days. In contrast to the existing evidence in other model systems [97,98,99], we found mTBI increased Kcnj10 expression in the satellite glia surrounding sensory neurons. This might suggest a protective role of glia in the TG through buffering extracellular potassium [100,101,102,103] where satellite glial cells could prevent further depolarization of sensory neurons. Additionally, the increased expression of glutamate transporter, Slc1a2, in the mTBI group signifies that glutamate signaling is involved in mTBI induced neuropathic pain as shown in other injury models [104, 105]. Since, there is high diversity in satellite glial cells [20, 94], increased expression of specific markers found in this study suggests that satellite glial cells of the TG may play a diverse role in mTBI whose precise function in pain is yet to be determined.

Compared to the satellite glia cells in the TG, glia in the Sp5C possess a distinct morphology and may have distinct functional roles [106,107,108]. Due to regional differences in the gene expression pattern [47] and unavailability of trigeminal Sp5C specific transcriptional cell atlas, we applied gene sets (e.g. astrocytes) specific for the brainstem and identified that astrocytes were enriched in the Sp5C. Astrocytes in different lamina of the spinal cord dorsal horn are known to have specific functions, including modulation of nociception and facilitation of tactile information [109]. Interestingly, the morphology of Sp5C astrocytes closely resembles the interlaminar astrocytes present only in the primate outer cortices [110, 111], or radial glial cells and, recent evidence shows that brainstem/cortical astrocytes have proliferative/migratory potentials [47]. Increased reactive gliosis or hypertrophied nature of Gfap + fibrous astrocytes in the mTBI and the presence of Gfap mRNA in the end processes of these fibrous astrocytes in the Sp5C suggest that these astrocytes are dynamically modulated in the brainstem long after injury. Similar results in the Sp5C were reported in partial ligation of the infraorbital trigeminal nerve [37], where elevated astrocytes persisted even months after injury [78]. Although morphology of GFAP + astrocytes are different in the spinal dorsal horn compared to Sp5C [112], because of the close proximity to Slc1a2, functionally, GFAP + fibers in the Sp5C could modulate neurons via glutamate signaling involved in neuropathic pain [47, 113,114,115,116]. In line with this, astrogliosis in the Sp5C has been shown to be involved in the development [117] and maintenance of pain [118]. Although we have not tested long term characteristics of reactive gliosis, Sp5C astrocytes may play a major role in the development of headache-like symptoms following mTBI and could be a target of treatment in chronic pain [119].

Potential involvement of inflammation in mTBI induced headache

Due to the extensive damage caused by the acceleration mTBI model to the brainstem, it was expected that injury related pathology might extend beyond Sp5C. Microglial proliferation was more prominent in white matter tracts (spinocerebellar/tectospinal/pyramidal tracts) than in gray matter areas. While the role of microglia in white matter tracts is suggested to involve phagocytosis of degenerating axons, as seen in spinal cord injury [120], their function in gray matter may differ. For instance, activated microglia in the gracile nucleus, associated with touch and proprioception, might contribute to pain symptoms, as seen in preclinical studies linking TBI to plantar tactile hypersensitivity [84]. Although we did not assess plantar tactile sensitivity in this study, the presence of activated microglia in the gracile nucleus indicated a potential role for inflammation in the paratrigeminal region.

Additionally, reactive astrogliosis in various brainstem regions, often in close proximity to microglia, suggests potential astrocyte-microglia interactions influencing neuroinflammation and pain modulation [53]. The increased expression of microglial markers in the Sp5C seven days post-injury, combined with the extended reach of astrocytic fibers, hints at a possible recruitment of astrocytes by microglia during neuroinflammation [121]. This interaction could potentially modulate glutamate signaling in the Sp5C, given the proximity of astrocytic fibers to Slc1a2. The widespread presence of Slc1a2 throughout the Sp5C [122], indicates ongoing glutamate signaling in healthy mice for facial proprioception, suggesting that increased reactive astrocytes in mTBI might further influence this signaling pathway. Consequently, the combined effects of reactive astrocytosis and elevated microglia activation could potentially regulate pain within the trigeminal system.

Since we observed increased inflammatory response in the Sp5C and its neighboring region in the brainstem, we sought to elucidate underlying neural mechanisms of pain. Calretinin-positive interneurons, a population known for their involvement in inflammation-induced pain [54], increased in number and reorganize within the superficial laminae of the Sp5C following mild TBI. This pattern closely resembles with those observed in the spinal dorsal horn after peripheral nerve injury [123]. Calretinin interneurons have been implicated in the activation of ascending pain signals via projections to the parabrachial nucleus leading to chronification of pain [124]. Considering the predominant excitatory nature of these interneurons and their role in pain propagation [125, 126], it is possible that reorganization from lamina II to lamina I and the increase in the number of calretinin-ir neurons following mTBI may contribute to the enhanced allodynia detected one week post-injury. Moreover, such recruitment would also explain an increase in microglia and astrocytes in the lamina I of the Sp5C to further augment ascending somatosensory pain signals. Further investigation into the interaction between glia and calretinin interneurons is warranted.

Conclusions

Overall, mTBI in mice developed periorbital sensitivity and grimace days after injury thereby exhibiting headache-like symptoms. While widespread inflammatory markers were observed in several pain-related regions, transcriptomic analyses revealed that head injury induced distinct pathogenic gene expression profiles in peripheral TG and central Sp5C, where glia have distinct functional roles. Thus, glia in the trigeminal regions appear to modulate headache-like symptoms and offer an avenue for further research on treatment targets for PTH following mTBI.

Data availability

The underlying data and computational scripts employed in this study will be shared upon request. Data used for meta-analysis can be found in Yang et al., 2022 (https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0896627322002288-mmc5.xlsx and https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0896627322002288-mmc13.xlsx) and data used for comparison of injury models can be found in Nguyen et al., 2019 (https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7554/eLife.49679.019).

Change history

Abbreviations

mTBI:

Mild traumatic brain injury

Sp5C:

Trigeminal nucleus caudalis

TG:

Trigeminal ganglion

PAG:

Periaqueductal gray

Irt:

Intermediate reticular nucleus

Mdv:

Medullary reticular nucleus, ventral part

py:

Pyramidal tract

sc:

Spinocerebellar tract

ts:

Tectospinal tract

Iba1:

Ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1

CD68:

Cluster of differentiation 68

GSEA:

Gene set enrichment analysis

CHIMERA:

Closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration

Gapdh:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

Gfap:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

Gja1:

Gap junction alpha-1

Egr1:

Early growth response factor 1

Aif1:

Allograft inflammatory factor 1

Kcnj10:

Potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 10

Slc1a2:

Solute carrier family 1 (glial high affinity glutamate transporter), member 2

References

  1. Peskind ER, Brody D, Cernak I, McKee A, Ruff RL (2013) Military- and sports-related mild traumatic brain injury: clinical presentation, management, and long-term consequences. J Clin Psychiatry 74:180–8. quiz 188

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashina H, Eigenbrodt AK, Seifert T, Sinclair AJ, Scher AI, Schytz HW et al (2021) Post-traumatic headache attributed to traumatic brain injury: classification, clinical characteristics, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 20:460–469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Couch JR, Bearss C (2001) Chronic daily headache in the posttrauma syndrome: relation to extent of head injury. Headache 41:559–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Holtkamp MD, Grimes J, Ling G (2016) Concussion in the military: an evidence-base review of mTBI in US military personnel focused on posttraumatic headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep 20:37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stovner LJ, Schrader H (2008) Correspondence: Head or neck injury increases the risk of chronic daily headache: a population-based study. Neurology 71:383–385. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1212/01.wnl.0000324088.61277.3f

  6. Couch JR, Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Scher AI (2007) Head or neck injury increases the risk of chronic daily headache: a population-based study. Neurology 69:1169–1177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Theeler BJ, Flynn FG, Erickson JC (2012) Chronic daily headache in U.S. soldiers after concussion. Headache 52:732–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nampiaparampil DE (2008) Prevalence of chronic pain after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. JAMA 300:711–719

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen SP, Plunkett AR, Wilkinson I, Nguyen C, Kurihara C, Flagg A 2nd et al (2012) Headaches during war: analysis of presentation, treatment, and factors associated with outcome. Cephalalgia 32:94–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Finkel AG, Yerry JA, Klaric JS, Ivins BJ, Scher A, Choi YS (2017) Headache in military service members with a history of mild traumatic brain injury: A cohort study of diagnosis and classification. Cephalalgia 37:548–559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL, Cox AL, Engel CC, Castro CA (2008) Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. Soldiers returning from Iraq. N Engl J Med 358:453–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Irvine K-A, Clark JD (2017) Chronic pain after traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology and pain mechanisms. Pain Med 19:1315–1333

    Google Scholar 

  13. Basbaum AI, Fields HL (1984) Endogenous pain control systems: brainstem spinal pathways and endorphin circuitry. Annu Rev Neurosci 7:309–338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Woolf CJ (2011) Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain 152:S2-15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dodick D, Silberstein S (2006) Central sensitization theory of migraine: clinical implications. Headache 46(Suppl 4):S182–S191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vila-Pueyo M, Hoffmann J, Romero-Reyes M, Akerman S (2019) Brain structure and function related to headache: Brainstem structure and function in headache. Cephalalgia 39:1635–1660

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Terrier L-M, Hadjikhani N, Velut S, Magnain C, Amelot A, Bernard F et al (2021) The trigeminal system: The meningovascular complex- A review. J Anat 239:1–11

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuramoto E, Fukushima M, Sendo R, Ohno S, Iwai H, Yamanaka A et al (2024) Three-dimensional topography of rat trigeminal ganglion neurons using a combination of retrograde labeling and tissue-clearing techniques. J Comp Neurol 532:e25584

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Capra NF, Dessem D (1992) Central connections of trigeminal primary afferent neurons: topographical and functional considerations. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 4:1–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanani M, Spray DC (2020) Emerging importance of satellite glia in nervous system function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci 21:485–498

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McGinnis A, Ji R-R (2023) The similar and distinct roles of satellite glial cells and spinal astrocytes in neuropathic pain. Cells 12. Available from: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/cells12060965

  22. Gennarelli TA, Thibault LE, Adams JH, Graham DI, Thompson CJ, Marcincin RP (1982) Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate. Ann Neurol 12:564–574

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Meaney DF, Morrison B, Dale BC (2014) The mechanics of traumatic brain injury: a review of what we know and what we need to know for reducing its societal burden. J Biomech Eng 136:021008

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Burstein R, Yamamura H, Malick A, Strassman AM (1998) Chemical stimulation of the intracranial dura induces enhanced responses to facial stimulation in brain stem trigeminal neurons. J Neurophysiol 79:964–982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Noseda R, Burstein R (2013) Migraine pathophysiology: anatomy of the trigeminovascular pathway and associated neurological symptoms, CSD, sensitization and modulation of pain. Pain 154 Suppl 1. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/00006396-201312001-00005

  26. Iwata K, Miyachi S, Imanishi M, Tsuboi Y, Kitagawa J, Teramoto K et al (2011) Ascending multisynaptic pathways from the trigeminal ganglion to the anterior cingulate cortex. Exp Neurol 227:69–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Goadsby PJ, Holland PR, Martins-Oliveira M, Hoffmann J, Schankin C, Akerman S (2017) Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing. Physiol Rev 97:553–622

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Shinoda M, Kubo A, Hayashi Y, Iwata K (2019) Peripheral and central mechanisms of persistent orofacial pain. Front Neurosci 13:1227

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lighthall JW, Dixon CE, Anderson TE (1989) Experimental models of brain injury. J Neurotrauma 6:83–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nilsson B, Pontén U, Voigt G (1977) Experimental head injury in the rat. Part 1: Mechanics, pathophysiology, and morphology in an impact acceleration trauma model. J Neurosurg 47:241–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gurdjian ES, Lissner HR, Webster JE, Latimer FR, Haddad BF (1954) Studies on experimental concussion: relation of physiologic effect to time duration of intracranial pressure increase at impact. Neurology 4:674–681

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cernak I (2005) Animal models of head trauma. NeuroRx 2:410–422

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M (2013) Animal models of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:128–142

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hoogenboom WS, Branch CA, Lipton ML (2019) Animal models of closed-skull, repetitive mild traumatic brain injury. Pharmacol Ther 198:109–122

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nguyen MQ, Le Pichon CE, Ryba N (2019) Stereotyped transcriptomic transformation of somatosensory neurons in response to injury. Elife 8. Available from: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7554/eLife.49679

  36. Yang L, Xu M, Bhuiyan SA, Li J, Zhao J, Cohrs RJ et al (2022) Human and mouse trigeminal ganglia cell atlas implicates multiple cell types in migraine. Neuron 110:1806–21.e8

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu M, Aita M, Chavkin C (2008) Partial infraorbital nerve ligation as a model of trigeminal nerve injury in the mouse: behavioral, neural, and glial reactions. J Pain 9:1036–1048

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Namjoshi DR, Cheng WH, McInnes KA, Martens KM, Carr M, Wilkinson A et al (2014) Merging pathology with biomechanics using CHIMERA (Closed-Head Impact Model of Engineered Rotational Acceleration): a novel, surgery-free model of traumatic brain injury. Mol Neurodegener 9:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  39. Smith DH, Nonaka M, Miller R, Leoni M, Chen XH, Alsop D et al (2000) Immediate coma following inertial brain injury dependent on axonal damage in the brainstem. J Neurosurg 93:315–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW et al (1994) Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods 53:55–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bonin RP, Bories C, De Koninck Y (2014) A simplified up-down method (SUDO) for measuring mechanical nociception in rodents using von Frey filaments. Mol Pain 10:26

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Langford DJ, Bailey AL, Chanda ML, Clarke SE, Drummond TE, Echols S et al (2010) Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nat Methods 7:447–449

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu A, Ibrahim JG, Love MI (2019) Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: removing the noise and preserving large differences. Bioinformatics 35:2084–2092

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan L, François R et al (2019) Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open Source Softw 4:1686

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mamet J, Klukinov M, Yaksh TL, Malkmus SA, Williams S, Harris S et al (2014) Single intrathecal administration of the transcription factor decoy AYX1 prevents acute and chronic pain after incisional, inflammatory, or neuropathic injury. Pain 155:322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bereiter DA, Hirata H, Hu JW (2000) Trigeminal subnucleus caudalis: beyond homologies with the spinal dorsal horn. Pain 88:221–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. John Lin C-C, Yu K, Hatcher A, Huang T-W, Lee HK, Carlson J et al (2017) Identification of diverse astrocyte populations and their malignant analogs. Nat Neurosci 20:396–405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Jacquin MF, Semba K, Rhoades RW, Egger MD (1982) Trigeminal primary afferents project bilaterally to dorsal horn and ipsilaterally to cerebellum, reticular formation, and cuneate, solitary, supratrigeminal and vagal nuclei. Brain Res 246:285–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Jacquin MF, Chiaia NL, Rhoades RW (1990) Trigeminal projections to contralateral dorsal horn: central extent, peripheral origins, and plasticity. Somatosens Mot Res 7:153–183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Voisin DL, Doméjean-Orliaguet S, Chalus M, Dallel R, Woda A (2002) Ascending connections from the caudal part to the oral part of the spinal trigeminal nucleus in the rat. Neuroscience 109:183–193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Sofroniew MV (2015) Astrocyte barriers to neurotoxic inflammation. Nat Rev Neurosci 16:249–263

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hasel P, Rose IVL, Sadick JS, Kim RD, Liddelow SA (2021) Neuroinflammatory astrocyte subtypes in the mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 24:1475–1487

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Linnerbauer M, Wheeler MA, Quintana FJ (2020) Astrocyte Crosstalk in CNS Inflammation. Neuron 108:608–622

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Peirs C, Williams S-PG, Zhao X, Arokiaraj CM, Ferreira DW, Noh MC et al (2021) Mechanical allodynia circuitry in the dorsal horn is defined by the nature of the injury. Neuron 109:73-90.e7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ommaya AK, Gennarelli TA (1974) Cerebral concussion and traumatic unconsciousness. Correlation of experimental and clinical observations of blunt head injuries. Brain 97:633–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Cifu D, Hurley R, Peterson M, Cornis-Pop M, Rikli PA et al (2009) Clinical practice guideline: Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 46:CP1

    Google Scholar 

  57. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38:1–211

  58. Ruff RM, Iverson GL, Barth JT, Bush SS, Broshek DK, NAN Policy and Planning Committee (2009) Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury: a National Academy of Neuropsychology education paper. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 24:3–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Mercer Lindsay N, Chen C, Gilam G, Mackey S, Scherrer G (2021) Brain circuits for pain and its treatment. Sci Transl Med 13:eabj7360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Basbaum AI, Bautista DM, Scherrer G, Julius D (2009) Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell 139:267–284

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Theeler BJ, Erickson JC (2009) Mild head trauma and chronic headaches in returning US soldiers. Headache 49:529–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Laurer HL, Bareyre FM, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ, Longhi L, Hoover R et al (2001) Mild head injury increasing the brain’s vulnerability to a second concussive impact. J Neurosurg 95:859–870

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Defrin R, Gruener H, Schreiber S, Pick CG (2010) Quantitative somatosensory testing of subjects with chronic post-traumatic headache: implications on its mechanisms. Eur J Pain 14:924–931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Defrin R, Riabinin M, Feingold Y, Schreiber S, Pick CG (2015) Deficient pain modulatory systems in patients with mild traumatic brain and chronic post-traumatic headache: implications for its mechanism. J Neurotrauma 32:28–37

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Gracely RH, Lynch SA, Bennett GJ (1992) Painful neuropathy: altered central processing maintained dynamically by peripheral input. Pain 51:175–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Burstein R (2001) Deconstructing migraine headache into peripheral and central sensitization. Pain 89:107–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Goadsby PJ, Hoskin KL (1997) The distribution of trigeminovascular afferents in the nonhuman primate brain Macaca nemestrina: a c-fos immunocytochemical study. J Anat 190(Pt 3):367–375

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Hoffman JM, Lucas S, Dikmen S, Braden CA, Brown AW, Brunner R et al (2011) Natural history of headache after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 28:1719–1725

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Buse DC, Greisman JD, Baigi K, Lipton RB (2019) Migraine progression: a systematic review. Headache 59:974–976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Dubner R, Ren K (2004) Brainstem mechanisms of persistent pain following injury. J Orofac Pain 18:299–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Rodriguez E, Sakurai K, Xu J, Chen Y, Toda K, Zhao S et al (2017) A craniofacial-specific monosynaptic circuit enables heightened affective pain. Nat Neurosci 20:1734–1743

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Cechetto DF, Standaert DG, Saper CB (1985) Spinal and trigeminal dorsal horn projections to the parabrachial nucleus in the rat. J Comp Neurol 240:153–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Mantyh PW (1982) The ascending input to the midbrain periaqueductal gray of the primate. J Comp Neurol 211:50–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Wiberg M, Westman J, Blomqvist A (1986) The projection to the mesencephalon from the sensory trigeminal nuclei. An anatomical study in the cat. Brain Res 399:51–68

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Liu Y, Broman J, Zhang M, Edvinsson L (2009) Brainstem and thalamic projections from a craniovascular sensory nervous centre in the rostral cervical spinal dorsal horn of rats. Cephalalgia 29:935–948

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Gauriau C, Bernard J-F (2004) A comparative reappraisal of projections from the superficial laminae of the dorsal horn in the rat: the forebrain. J Comp Neurol 468:24–56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Witcher KG, Dziabis JE, Bray CE, Gordillo AJ, Kumar JE, Eiferman DS et al (2020) Comparison between midline and lateral fluid percussion injury in mice reveals prolonged but divergent cortical neuroinflammation. Brain Res 1746:146987

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Carbonell WS, Grady MS (1999) Regional and temporal characterization of neuronal, glial, and axonal response after traumatic brain injury in the mouse. Acta Neuropathol 98:396–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. McIntosh TK, Smith DH, Meaney DF, Kotapka MJ, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI (1996) Neuropathological sequelae of traumatic brain injury: relationship to neurochemical and biomechanical mechanisms. Lab Invest 74:315–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Tse KM, Tan LB, Lee SJ, Lim SP, Lee HP (2015) Investigation of the relationship between facial injuries and traumatic brain injuries using a realistic subject-specific finite element head model. Accid Anal Prev 79:13–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Brommer B, Engel O, Kopp MA, Watzlawick R, Müller S, Prüss H et al (2016) Spinal cord injury-induced immune deficiency syndrome enhances infection susceptibility dependent on lesion level. Brain 139:692–707

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Devor M, Amir R, Rappaport ZH (2002) Pathophysiology of trigeminal neuralgia: the ignition hypothesis. Clin J Pain 18:4–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Pradhan AA, Smith ML, McGuire B, Tarash I, Evans CJ, Charles A (2014) Characterization of a novel model of chronic migraine. Pain 155:269–274

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Wattiez A-S, Castonguay WC, Gaul OJ, Waite JS, Schmidt CM, Reis AS et al (2021) Different forms of traumatic brain injuries cause different tactile hypersensitivity profiles. Pain 162:1163–1175

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Wen J, Tanaka M, Zhang Y (2024) Inhibition of 2-AG hydrolysis alleviates posttraumatic headache attributed to mild traumatic brain injury. J Headache Pain 25:115

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Bree D, Levy D (2018) Development of CGRP-dependent pain and headache related behaviours in a rat model of concussion: Implications for mechanisms of post-traumatic headache. Cephalalgia 38:246–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Guo Z, Czerpaniak K, Zhang J, Cao Y-Q (2021) Increase in trigeminal ganglion neurons that respond to both calcitonin gene-related peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide in mouse models of chronic migraine and posttraumatic headache. Pain 162:1483–1499

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Tang-Schomer MD, Patel AR, Baas PW, Smith DH (2010) Mechanical breaking of microtubules in axons during dynamic stretch injury underlies delayed elasticity, microtubule disassembly, and axon degeneration. FASEB J 24:1401–1410

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Blennow K, Hardy J, Zetterberg H (2012) The neuropathology and neurobiology of traumatic brain injury. Neuron 76:886–899

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Aita M, Byers MR, Chavkin C, Xu M (2010) Trigeminal injury causes kappa opioid-dependent allodynic, glial and immune cell responses in mice. Mol Pain 6:8

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Liu L, Rudin M, Kozlova EN (2000) Glial cell proliferation in the spinal cord after dorsal rhizotomy or sciatic nerve transection in the adult rat. Exp Brain Res 131:64–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Kleczkowska P, Lipkowski AW (2013) Neurotensin and neurotensin receptors: Characteristic, structure–activity relationship and pain modulation — A review. Eur J Pharmacol 716:54–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Cox HC, Lea RA, Bellis C et al (2011) Variants in the human potassium channel gene (KCNN3) are associated with migraine in a high risk genetic isolate. J Headache Pain 12:603–608

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Mapps AA, Thomsen MB, Boehm E, Zhao H, Hattar S, Kuruvilla R (2022) Diversity of satellite glia in sympathetic and sensory ganglia. Cell Rep 38:110328

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Ji R-R, Donnelly CR, Nedergaard M (2019) Astrocytes in chronic pain and itch. Nat Rev Neurosci 20:667–685

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Avraham O, Deng P-Y, Jones S, Kuruvilla R, Semenkovich CF, Klyachko VA et al (2020) Satellite glial cells promote regenerative growth in sensory neurons. Nat Commun 11:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  97. Vit J-P, Ohara PT, Bhargava A, Kelley K, Jasmin L (2008) Silencing the Kir4.1 potassium channel subunit in satellite glial cells of the rat trigeminal ganglion results in pain-like behavior in the absence of nerve injury. J Neurosci 28:4161–71

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Zhang H, Mei X, Zhang P, Ma C, White FA, Donnelly DF et al (2009) Altered functional properties of satellite glial cells in compressed spinal ganglia. Glia 57:1588–1599

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Takeda M, Takahashi M, Nasu M, Matsumoto S (2011) Peripheral inflammation suppresses inward rectifying potassium currents of satellite glial cells in the trigeminal ganglia. Pain 152:2147–2156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Tsantoulas C, McMahon SB (2014) Opening paths to novel analgesics: the role of potassium channels in chronic pain. Trends Neurosci 37:146–158

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Butt AM, Kalsi A (2006) Inwardly rectifying potassium channels (Kir) in central nervous system glia: a special role for Kir4.1 in glial functions. J Cell Mol Med 10:33–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Ohara PT, Vit J-P, Bhargava A, Romero M, Sundberg C, Charles AC et al (2009) Gliopathic pain: when satellite glial cells go bad. Neuroscientist 15:450–463

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Tang X, Schmidt TM, Perez-Leighton CE, Kofuji P (2010) Inwardly rectifying potassium channel Kir4.1 is responsible for the native inward potassium conductance of satellite glial cells in sensory ganglia. Neuroscience 166:397–407

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Kung L-H, Gong K, Adedoyin M, Ng J, Bhargava A, Ohara PT et al (2013) Evidence for glutamate as a neuroglial transmitter within sensory ganglia. PLoS ONE 8:e68312

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Satellite glial cells in sensory ganglia (2015) its role in pain. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition) 65:73–81

    Google Scholar 

  106. Emsley JG, Macklis JD (2006) Astroglial heterogeneity closely reflects the neuronal-defined anatomy of the adult murine CNS. Neuron Glia Biol 2:175–186

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Oberheim NA, Goldman SA, Nedergaard M (2012) Heterogeneity of astrocytic form and function. Methods Mol Biol 814:23–45

  108. Verkhratsky A, Nedergaard M (2018) Physiology of Astroglia. Physiol Rev 98:239–389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Kronschläger MT, Siegert ASM, Resch FJ, Rajendran PS, Khakh BS, Sandkühler J (2021) Lamina-specific properties of spinal astrocytes. Glia 69:1749–1766

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Andriezen WL (1893) The Neuroglia Elements in the Human Brain. Br Med J 2:227–230

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Colombo JA, Yáñez A, Puissant V, Lipina S (1995) Long, interlaminar astroglial cell processes in the cortex of adult monkeys. J Neurosci Res 40:551–556

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Garrison CJ, Dougherty PM, Kajander KC, Carlton SM (1991) Staining of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in lumbar spinal cord increases following a sciatic nerve constriction injury. Brain Res 565:1–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Araque A, Carmignoto G, Haydon PG, Oliet SHR, Robitaille R, Volterra A (2014) Gliotransmitters travel in time and space. Neuron 81:728–739

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Nie H, Zhang H, Weng H-R (2010) Bidirectional neuron-glia interactions triggered by deficiency of glutamate uptake at spinal sensory synapses. J Neurophysiol 104:713–725

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Bardoni R, Ghirri A, Zonta M, Betelli C, Vitale G, Ruggieri V et al (2010) Glutamate-mediated astrocyte-to-neuron signalling in the rat dorsal horn. J Physiol 588:831–846

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Anderson CM, Swanson RA (2000) Astrocyte glutamate transport: review of properties, regulation, and physiological functions. Glia 32:1–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Colburn RW, Rickman AJ, DeLeo JA (1999) The effect of site and type of nerve injury on spinal glial activation and neuropathic pain behavior. Exp Neurol 157:289–304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Okada-Ogawa A, Suzuki I, Sessle BJ, Chiang C-Y, Salter MW, Dostrovsky JO et al (2009) Astroglia in Medullary Dorsal Horn (Trigeminal Spinal Subnucleus Caudalis) Are Involved in Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain Mechanisms. J Neurosci 29:11161–11171

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Ji R-R, Xu Z-Z, Gao Y-J (2014) Emerging targets in neuroinflammation-driven chronic pain. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:533–548

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Matson KJE, Russ DE, Kathe C, Hua I, Maric D, Ding Y et al (2022) Single cell atlas of spinal cord injury in mice reveals a pro-regenerative signature in spinocerebellar neurons. Nat Commun 13:5628

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L et al (2017) Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 541:481–487

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Rothstein JD, Martin L, Levey AI, Dykes-Hoberg M, Jin L, Wu D et al (1994) Localization of neuronal and glial glutamate transporters. Neuron 13:713–725

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ (2009) Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. J Pain 10:895–926

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Petitjean H, Bourojeni FB, Tsao D, Davidova A, Sotocinal SG, Mogil JS et al (2019) Recruitment of spinoparabrachial neurons by dorsal horn calretinin neurons. Cell Rep 28:1429–38.e4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Smith KM, Boyle KA, Madden JF, Dickinson SA, Jobling P, Callister RJ et al (2015) Functional heterogeneity of calretinin-expressing neurons in the mouse superficial dorsal horn: implications for spinal pain processing. J Physiol 593:4319–4339

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Smith KM, Browne TJ, Davis OC, Coyle A, Boyle KA, Watanabe M, et al (2019) Calretinin positive neurons form an excitatory amplifier network in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Elife 8. Available from: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7554/eLife.49190

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jie Wen, MD, Ph.D., for performing the von Frey testing. We also thank Amanda Fu, MD, and Laura Tucker, MS at the USUHS Preclinical Behavior and Modeling Core for assistance with mouse procedures, Dennis McDaniel, Ph.D., and Fritz Lischka, Ph.D., at the USUHS Biomedical Instrumentation Core for Imaging, and Gemini for text editing. We gratefully acknowledge the Student Bioinformatics Initiative (SBI) at the USUHS for providing crucial high-performance computing resources. We also extend our thanks to Andrew Frank, MS, Clifton Dalgard, Ph.D., and Matthew Wilkerson, Ph.D., for their insightful discussions and feedback on our bioinformatics approaches.

Disclaimer

The statements and data presented in this manuscript belong to the authors of the manuscript and do not reflect the views of the Department of Defense or the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Funding

This work was supported by the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) award (W81XWH2120457).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.N. and Y.Z. designed the experiments. G.N. conducted the experiments analyzed the data. G.N. and Y.Z. interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. Y.Z. acquired the research funding. All authors have read and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yumin Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the Office for Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW), National Institutes of Health (NIH) and American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals guidelines and approved by the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: “Data availability statement has been corrected.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Righting reflex in each of four mTBI days (n=6/group).

10194_2024_1897_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Additional file 2: Bar graphs representing grimace at 6, 16- and 22-days post mTBI (dpi) in bregma position (n=4-5/group).

10194_2024_1897_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx

Additional file 3: Enriched Go terms and differentially expressed genes from three different regions (TG, Sp5C and PAG) following mTBI.

Additional file 4: Dot plot representing astrocyte specific enriched gene sets in the Sp5C following mTBI.

10194_2024_1897_MOESM5_ESM.pdf

Additional file 5: Distinct expression pattern of CD68+, Iba1+ cells in the brainstem. Fiber tracts, specifically spinocerebellar tract (sc), show a distinct morphological profile compared to the microglia in the gray matter (Sp5C, Gr, Mdv). Gr - gracile nucleus; Mdv - Medullary reticular nucleus.

10194_2024_1897_MOESM6_ESM.pdf

Additional file 6: Increased presence of GFAP+ fibrous astrocytes in the Sp5C compared to the paratrigeminal regions. Rare appearance of protoplasmic astrocytes in the Sp5C and prominent protoplasmic appears in the reticular formation in both Sham and mTBI. IRt - Intermediate reticular nucleus.

10194_2024_1897_MOESM7_ESM.pdf

Additional file 7: Representative images from sham and mTBI mice showing calretinin-ir neurons in the lamina I of Sp5C. Dotted white lines represent the Ib4+ staining. Atlas plate at the level of ~ -8.3 from bregma. Scale bar = 200 µm.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagarajan, G., Zhang, Y. Distinct expression profile reveals glia involvement in the trigeminal system attributing to post-traumatic headache. J Headache Pain 25, 203 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s10194-024-01897-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s10194-024-01897-x

Keywords